Skip to main content

POSH Law for Men in India: A Silent Side of the Conversation

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013 was introduced in India with the objective of providing a safe working environment for women. While this legislation was a much-needed step towards protecting women at the workplace, a common question that arises today is—what about men? Can men be victims of sexual harassment at the workplace too? And if so, are they protected under Indian law?

This blog explores the often-overlooked issue of sexual harassment against men, their legal standing under the POSH Act, and the need for inclusive policies in India.

Understanding the POSH Act

The POSH Act primarily focuses on the protection of women from sexual harassment at workplaces. It defines sexual harassment, sets up internal complaint committees (ICC) in organizations, and lays down the procedures for filing and resolving complaints.

However, the act clearly states that only women can file a complaint under it. This means that men (and even LGBTQ+ individuals) currently do not have legal recourse under POSH if they are sexually harassed at work.

Can Men Be Victims of Sexual Harassment?

Absolutely, yes. Sexual harassment is not gender-specific. Men can face:

  • Unwanted physical contact
  • Sexual advances
  • Verbal abuse or lewd remarks
  • Hostile or toxic work environments
  • Harassment by women or by individuals of the same gender

Yet, their experiences often go unreported due to stigma, fear of ridicule, or the belief that "men can't be victims."

Legal Options for Men in India

Even though men are excluded from the POSH Act, they are not without protection. Here are some possible legal avenues:

1. Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Men can file a complaint under certain sections of the IPC, such as:

  • Section 354A (if the accused is a woman and the act falls under sexual harassment)
  • Section 509 (word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a person)

However, most of these sections are gender-biased in language and favor women as victims.

2. Civil Lawsuits

Men may approach civil courts for damages or psychological trauma through tort law, although this is time-consuming and less accessible than internal committees.

3. Company Policies

Some progressive organizations have gender-neutral sexual harassment policies, allowing men to file complaints internally, even if not under the POSH Act.

The Call for Gender-Neutral Laws

India is witnessing a slow but growing movement advocating for gender-neutral workplace harassment laws. Countries like the U.S., U.K., and Canada already have such inclusive frameworks.

Making POSH or a similar act inclusive of all genders would:

  • Encourage more victims to speak up
  • Ensure equality and fairness
  • Protect all employees, regardless of gender or sexual orientation

Why It Matters

Mental health: Male victims may suffer from stress, anxiety, or depression due to harassment and lack of support.

Workplace equality: Ignoring male victims undermines the idea of equal rights and safe workspaces for everyone.

Legal reform: Recognizing male victims will lead to better policies and safer, more productive work environments.

Conclusion

While the POSH Act has been instrumental in empowering women at workplaces, it's time to widen the conversation. Sexual harassment is a human issue, not just a women's issue. A fair and inclusive legal system must acknowledge that men, too, can be vulnerable and deserve protection.

India needs to evolve its laws to reflect the changing dynamics of modern workplaces. The journey towards gender justice is not complete unless every voice is heard, and every victim is protected—regardless of gender.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posh Act - Confidentiality vs Transparency

Confidentiality vs Transparency – Managing Sensitive Investigations Confidentiality is a statutory mandate under the POSH Act . Disclosure of identities, contents of complaint, witness details, or recommendations is prohibited. The objective is to protect dignity and prevent retaliation or workplace gossip. However, confidentiality does not mean secrecy without accountability. Employers must still ensure procedural transparency between parties sharing responses, evidence summaries, and findings. The balance lies in controlled disclosure within the inquiry framework, not public communication. Improper leaks can result in statutory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations must restrict access to inquiry records and sensitize leadership about non-interference. Simultaneously, leadership must communicate a culture of zero tolerance without discussing case specifics. Transparency about policy commitment, rather than individual cases, strengthens trust. Managing this balance is criti...
Post a Comment
Read more

POSH Cases: Madras High Court Highlights the Need for Sensitivity and Neutrality

V. Anantharaman v. The Institute of Financial Management & Others In an important judgment that underscores the need for sensitivity, neutrality, and procedural fairness in handling sexual harassment complaints, the Madras High Court in V. Anantharaman v. The Institute of Financial Management & Others reinforced the responsibilities of Internal Committees (ICs) and employers under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ). The Court emphasized that while the protection of the complainant is central to the Act, the rights of the accused must also be safeguarded through a fair and unbiased process. The case involved V. Anantharaman, a senior official accused of sexual harassment, who challenged the Internal Committee’s inquiry process on grounds of procedural lapses, lack of neutrality, and failure to provide him a reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The petitioner contended that the IC's proceedings we...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delhi High Court Reaffirms Importance of Natural Justice in POSH Inquiries: Somaya Gupta v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors

In a landmark judgment reinforcing the principles of fairness and impartiality under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Delhi High Court in Somaya Gupta v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Others (2018) clarified the essential procedural safeguards to be followed by Internal Committees (ICs) while handling complaints of sexual harassment. The Court held that mere apprehension of bias is insufficient to exclude a member from the Internal Committee; rather, there must be a real likelihood of bias established on substantive grounds. The case involved a faculty member at Jawaharlal Nehru University who raised concerns over the composition of the Internal Committee, alleging potential bias and lack of impartiality. The petitioner sought the removal of certain committee members on the grounds of perceived conflict of interest and personal connections, fearing that these factors could influence the inquiry process....
Post a Comment
Read more