Skip to main content

Steps that HR Department Must take To Prevent Sexual Harassment At Work.

A large portion of the workplace in India is plagued by the problem of sexual harassment. In order to prevent it, businesses should take precautions, and they should also be prepared to address it if it does. The HR department is in charge of making sure compliance. To make the workplace safe for employees, they can implement Posh rules and take the ten steps listed below.

HR should make sure that the business has several reporting options, including anonymous reporting, for sexual harassment. They must also ensure that the staff is aware of these options, whatever they may be.

A human resources professional must understand that harassment can affect anyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, or other identifiers. Many LGBTQ employees are especially susceptible to harassment, whether it be sexual or otherwise. Sexual harassment can happen to anyone, even straight males in powerful positions inside the organisation. Every report should be taken seriously, and every investigation should start with the purpose of learning the truth rather than working backwards from a presumptive conclusion. If there is one thing that HR departments want, it is to be viewed as "the good policemen" rather than another barrier. 

The Posh policy must cover bystander training. This might be a good way to raise issues before they become outright harassment. It's a more recent idea, but college campuses have begun applying it to prevent sexual assault. Employees who have received bystander training are taught when and how to step in to stop harassment. It can counteract what is referred to as "the bystander effect," when individuals are less likely to intervene in a quarrel when others are present because they assume others will do so first. Now, it is up to HR to provide employees with the confidence and security they need to step in during a conflict.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posh Act - Confidentiality vs Transparency

Confidentiality vs Transparency – Managing Sensitive Investigations Confidentiality is a statutory mandate under the POSH Act . Disclosure of identities, contents of complaint, witness details, or recommendations is prohibited. The objective is to protect dignity and prevent retaliation or workplace gossip. However, confidentiality does not mean secrecy without accountability. Employers must still ensure procedural transparency between parties sharing responses, evidence summaries, and findings. The balance lies in controlled disclosure within the inquiry framework, not public communication. Improper leaks can result in statutory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations must restrict access to inquiry records and sensitize leadership about non-interference. Simultaneously, leadership must communicate a culture of zero tolerance without discussing case specifics. Transparency about policy commitment, rather than individual cases, strengthens trust. Managing this balance is criti...
Post a Comment
Read more

POSH Cases: Madras High Court Highlights the Need for Sensitivity and Neutrality

V. Anantharaman v. The Institute of Financial Management & Others In an important judgment that underscores the need for sensitivity, neutrality, and procedural fairness in handling sexual harassment complaints, the Madras High Court in V. Anantharaman v. The Institute of Financial Management & Others reinforced the responsibilities of Internal Committees (ICs) and employers under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ). The Court emphasized that while the protection of the complainant is central to the Act, the rights of the accused must also be safeguarded through a fair and unbiased process. The case involved V. Anantharaman, a senior official accused of sexual harassment, who challenged the Internal Committee’s inquiry process on grounds of procedural lapses, lack of neutrality, and failure to provide him a reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The petitioner contended that the IC's proceedings we...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delhi High Court Reaffirms Importance of Natural Justice in POSH Inquiries: Somaya Gupta v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors

In a landmark judgment reinforcing the principles of fairness and impartiality under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Delhi High Court in Somaya Gupta v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Others (2018) clarified the essential procedural safeguards to be followed by Internal Committees (ICs) while handling complaints of sexual harassment. The Court held that mere apprehension of bias is insufficient to exclude a member from the Internal Committee; rather, there must be a real likelihood of bias established on substantive grounds. The case involved a faculty member at Jawaharlal Nehru University who raised concerns over the composition of the Internal Committee, alleging potential bias and lack of impartiality. The petitioner sought the removal of certain committee members on the grounds of perceived conflict of interest and personal connections, fearing that these factors could influence the inquiry process....
Post a Comment
Read more